Marketing With Jackson 4/6/19
|
Today's update has a special new facet which includes a written “preamble”. This development coincides naturally with my previous expounding on “systems intelligence”: the longer you can keep your livelihood and living arrangement intact the better systems you can apply to your routine, the more you can accumulate, while all the while you begin to see your life as being more predictable. As Donald trump liked to say during the campaign, “be unpredictable!” which implies that predictability gives you a kind of weakness. If your daily life as seen as a challenge to overcome is predictable, it is therefore giving you an advantage over it.
Although the cheering throngs outside my window after my last update were encouraging, and they carried me on their shoulders to a castle with magical pumpkins and glass shoes involved in a gigantic great gatsby like party, the truth is I don’t remember much of it. |

I’m looking onward and upward to better, more entertaining updates to grow my fan base and follower base, improve my website, encouraging further interest in my megalithic traditional and digital art and animation project, “The Adoration of the Magi”.
So, assuming my life retains an element of predictability, I should be releasing biweekly marketing with Jackson episodes with a more diverse portfolio of a higher quality.
As usual, I will start with a brief project update: I purchased an extremely powerful laptop:
(MSI GP73 Leopard 17.3 inch Premium Gaming and Business Laptop (Intel 8th Gen i7-8750H 6-C, 32GB RAM, 2TB HDD + 1TB PCIe SSD, 17.3" FHD 1920x1080, GTX 1060, Backlit Keyboard, Win 10 Pro) VR Ready)
So, assuming my life retains an element of predictability, I should be releasing biweekly marketing with Jackson episodes with a more diverse portfolio of a higher quality.
As usual, I will start with a brief project update: I purchased an extremely powerful laptop:
(MSI GP73 Leopard 17.3 inch Premium Gaming and Business Laptop (Intel 8th Gen i7-8750H 6-C, 32GB RAM, 2TB HDD + 1TB PCIe SSD, 17.3" FHD 1920x1080, GTX 1060, Backlit Keyboard, Win 10 Pro) VR Ready)
Buying this computer has been a goal of mine for the last 4 years: upon receipt of this engineering marvel, I promptly purchased a full fledged version of Auto-desk Maya, an (animation suite) and got to work on the severely belated digital version of the project.
My considerably rudimentary digi-skills were unleashed in a frenzy of time consuming and relentless initiation of this phase of my project- if the learning curve was a very steep mountain, I have burned 50 thousand calories in the past week climbing it.
The next most important goal for me is to considerable overhaul my website into a more broadly formatted and easily navigable structure for you to pursue at your leisure. Many of you are aware that i am in the U.S. Army, and during the initial training (about 6 months) i did not have access to actual computers. I also have a go fund me page on the site which has to be updated because although i no longer need money for college (the Army pays for it) I still require a diverse team of professionals to bring my digital animation dreams into reality.
I like to read as much as I can, at least an hour a day, this is supplemented by the study of geography on the Seterra app on my phone, and numerous documentaries about relevant content. I always read nonfiction, because I believe that piecing together the real history and nature of our world is part of a larger and more interesting and utilitarian story that can help in the understanding of human nature, the events that shape present mass thinking, state actions and the multitude of factors which represent our collective conscious and schisms therein.
I’m reading a book called “When China Rules the World”, by Martin Jaques, as if the title doesn’t go far enough to fly into the western face, the supplemental title; “the end of the western world and the birth of a new global order” is added. The book is mostly representative of the year 2010, but the contract for the book was signed in the mid 90’s, giving him 15 years to pursue writing it. I’m a patriot for the United States, and I love our representative democracy- I love our military presence across the world and the stabilizing effect it has globally- that is my caviat for entertaining a book with this title. Splitting dichotomies thrust into our lives paid for by caterers to shock and scandal- for the first time in my life I paid for a subscription to cable TV and watched Fox and CNN, I am in disbelief of the non objective outlooks of these outlets. I like the ‘slam around’ nature of our politics, you can be sure to always get 2 sides of the coin, but it magnifies the sensitivities that people associate with the causes to which they endear themselves. A country like China feels itself to be very precariously perched on the political vortex, and historically countries with this social landscape fall into civil war, or extreme polarization which generally allows for outside influence by third party governments like the French in the American revolution- this is what China seeks to avoid by any means after it’s self proclaimed “century of humiliation” between 1839 and 1949. We have free speech in America, but it’s almost like we don’t because you can’t really say your political opinion in public without risking a severe confrontation by people who adamantly feel that you shouldn’t be speaking ‘freely’ after all.
I have a very unemotional and non reactive view of politics and i feel that it is based on my belief that multiple ways towards a single goal do exist, and that single goal is utilitarian well being for all people. I like Trump and Ocasio Cortes, respectively.
“Ol King Cole was a merry ol soul, was a merry ol soul was he.”- said 50% of the population, the other 50% were outside the castle with daggers and pitchforks, thrusting them in wavelike convulsions, piercing the air, illuminated by torches, with fiery dispositions contriving to enunciate utterances such as “DOWN WITH THE KING”. They don’t tell you that in the folklore, and who the good guys were and the bad guys were in the modern age will have to be different authors as well in a distant future amalgamation of authors. SO in our present “exalted state” we are painting the past red, by blotting out such figures as the likes of statues of those now condemned slaveholding individuals, and little beknownst to ourselves, we are painting the future red as well, because an objective, passionate soul would have to jump through significant hoops to objectivize the slanderous nature of our current political climate. My statue may be condemned to the throw of the stone or the mark of the paint canister, because I eat meat- I am hoping for a cost effective lab grown alternative, but not looking to get into an ideological debate over it.. I just don’t like thinking of those animals suffering in cages, I want them to roam free and frolic about scenicly in picturesque pastures and great western plains. It’s hard to shoot an arrow into the future where you don’t know where the bullseye is.
Some kind of way to objectify the media would be hard but maybe there could be channel called FOXCNN, with outtakes from the slam around arena which would be attractive in it’s cage fight like spirit, with commentators pledged to defending only the execution of the slander.
The book spends time enumerating on the essence of the “nation state”, ensuring that the nation state is a modern phenomenon, paying heed to the “Peace of Westphalia”- “European settlements of 1648, which brought to an end the Eighty Years' War between Spain and the Dutch and the German phase of the Thirty Years' War.” (wiki) The treaty is seen by many to be the birth of the nation state, and is referenced heavily in “World Order” by Henry Kissinger (2014) being used as a reference for the modern order in the west. The author Jaques, insists that China is a ‘civilation state” and has a different notion of the nation state, causing it to consider itself as it once did “the center of the world”. The book also talks many times about the Confucian tendancy to regulate human behavior by the threat of “family shame and disgrace” as opposed to the Christian “guilt of original sin” he talks a lot about the opposing views of communism and confucianism, without enumerating very well on the discrepancy. These views do not stick with me, and I find them to be indications of a shallow “conversational” approach to the book. I think people just don’t want to %&^$ up, in either society, and I think that the nation state is regarded by those under whatever government happens to exist, is roughly similar, it’s the set of rules you have to live by under the threat of penalty- I think patriotism and the common understanding of the realm is roughly similar. He throws out passing references to governments like that of Italy, saying the government is weak, and using Silvio Berlusconi who “used the state to his own advantage” as an example, taking up about half a page. I was expecting a book. Berlusconi is a very controversial character, but I remember him (maybe naively) for a quote that represents an ability simply superior to my own “ from every evil you must know how to draw goodness, or, as my father would say, you must always carry the sun in your pocket and offer it to all the people you meet.”
Being the “basket of contradictions” that I am I have multitudinal views about organisations countries and ideologies as I expertly dissect the layers of logic in order to digest the meaningful contents and discard the rest, much like the process of reading this book. There are plentiful tables and graphs that illustrate China's rise.
I’m reading a book called “When China Rules the World”, by Martin Jaques, as if the title doesn’t go far enough to fly into the western face, the supplemental title; “the end of the western world and the birth of a new global order” is added. The book is mostly representative of the year 2010, but the contract for the book was signed in the mid 90’s, giving him 15 years to pursue writing it. I’m a patriot for the United States, and I love our representative democracy- I love our military presence across the world and the stabilizing effect it has globally- that is my caviat for entertaining a book with this title. Splitting dichotomies thrust into our lives paid for by caterers to shock and scandal- for the first time in my life I paid for a subscription to cable TV and watched Fox and CNN, I am in disbelief of the non objective outlooks of these outlets. I like the ‘slam around’ nature of our politics, you can be sure to always get 2 sides of the coin, but it magnifies the sensitivities that people associate with the causes to which they endear themselves. A country like China feels itself to be very precariously perched on the political vortex, and historically countries with this social landscape fall into civil war, or extreme polarization which generally allows for outside influence by third party governments like the French in the American revolution- this is what China seeks to avoid by any means after it’s self proclaimed “century of humiliation” between 1839 and 1949. We have free speech in America, but it’s almost like we don’t because you can’t really say your political opinion in public without risking a severe confrontation by people who adamantly feel that you shouldn’t be speaking ‘freely’ after all.
I have a very unemotional and non reactive view of politics and i feel that it is based on my belief that multiple ways towards a single goal do exist, and that single goal is utilitarian well being for all people. I like Trump and Ocasio Cortes, respectively.
“Ol King Cole was a merry ol soul, was a merry ol soul was he.”- said 50% of the population, the other 50% were outside the castle with daggers and pitchforks, thrusting them in wavelike convulsions, piercing the air, illuminated by torches, with fiery dispositions contriving to enunciate utterances such as “DOWN WITH THE KING”. They don’t tell you that in the folklore, and who the good guys were and the bad guys were in the modern age will have to be different authors as well in a distant future amalgamation of authors. SO in our present “exalted state” we are painting the past red, by blotting out such figures as the likes of statues of those now condemned slaveholding individuals, and little beknownst to ourselves, we are painting the future red as well, because an objective, passionate soul would have to jump through significant hoops to objectivize the slanderous nature of our current political climate. My statue may be condemned to the throw of the stone or the mark of the paint canister, because I eat meat- I am hoping for a cost effective lab grown alternative, but not looking to get into an ideological debate over it.. I just don’t like thinking of those animals suffering in cages, I want them to roam free and frolic about scenicly in picturesque pastures and great western plains. It’s hard to shoot an arrow into the future where you don’t know where the bullseye is.
Some kind of way to objectify the media would be hard but maybe there could be channel called FOXCNN, with outtakes from the slam around arena which would be attractive in it’s cage fight like spirit, with commentators pledged to defending only the execution of the slander.
The book spends time enumerating on the essence of the “nation state”, ensuring that the nation state is a modern phenomenon, paying heed to the “Peace of Westphalia”- “European settlements of 1648, which brought to an end the Eighty Years' War between Spain and the Dutch and the German phase of the Thirty Years' War.” (wiki) The treaty is seen by many to be the birth of the nation state, and is referenced heavily in “World Order” by Henry Kissinger (2014) being used as a reference for the modern order in the west. The author Jaques, insists that China is a ‘civilation state” and has a different notion of the nation state, causing it to consider itself as it once did “the center of the world”. The book also talks many times about the Confucian tendancy to regulate human behavior by the threat of “family shame and disgrace” as opposed to the Christian “guilt of original sin” he talks a lot about the opposing views of communism and confucianism, without enumerating very well on the discrepancy. These views do not stick with me, and I find them to be indications of a shallow “conversational” approach to the book. I think people just don’t want to %&^$ up, in either society, and I think that the nation state is regarded by those under whatever government happens to exist, is roughly similar, it’s the set of rules you have to live by under the threat of penalty- I think patriotism and the common understanding of the realm is roughly similar. He throws out passing references to governments like that of Italy, saying the government is weak, and using Silvio Berlusconi who “used the state to his own advantage” as an example, taking up about half a page. I was expecting a book. Berlusconi is a very controversial character, but I remember him (maybe naively) for a quote that represents an ability simply superior to my own “ from every evil you must know how to draw goodness, or, as my father would say, you must always carry the sun in your pocket and offer it to all the people you meet.”
Being the “basket of contradictions” that I am I have multitudinal views about organisations countries and ideologies as I expertly dissect the layers of logic in order to digest the meaningful contents and discard the rest, much like the process of reading this book. There are plentiful tables and graphs that illustrate China's rise.
A contradiction that stands out for me involves my questionable credit, and the slipping nature of the national credit as illustrated by our rampant debt which includes a figure well over our yearly GDP- China’s debt to GDP is roughly half. As our voters vote more dollars into thin air our currency is undermined, but unlike China, whose PPP (purchasing power parity) is not simultaneously strengthening with the dilution of their own currency, the stretching of our money is not translated into money making domestic and overseas venues, it is being dumped into domestic entitlement programs which is disproportionately spent of consumption, not investment. Our government bonds are being undermined, bonds that are used for monetary easing which is money creation in a process of mass purchasing by the FED. I think it is important to look a not how we can get more money for the public sector outside of R & D, but how to improve the use of the resources we already have. Public school attendees have roughly $40k per year spent on them on average, and although this is including the overhead for school buildings and utilities, these students don’t even have personal computers, and American exceptionalism seems to have shosen public school statistics as an exception to itself.
The financial crisis of 2008 illustrated the immoral conduct of our financial system, and was a just punishment for the greed and corruption rampant in the financial industry, which was an indicator of a more broad sense of entitlement and corrupt instinct that pulses like a vein through our society. You don’t need massive government oversight to know that you can’t lend a consumer $150k for a home when they have no income, no job, and no assets, but the simple presence of the opportunity to bundle these toxic assets into complex derivatives and “send it , bro” was enough to entice hundreds of billions in fraud. The simple presence of an opportunity for fraud should not preclude it’s massive utilization on an economy wide scale.
The presence of my unlocked bicycle was always enough to entice it’s theft, the presence of my tax return in my mailbox was enough to motivate it’s theft. Shame and guilt do not seem to be enough to save us from hurting each other for the purpose of our own gains. Facebook wants to look through your camera to see your facial expression to gauge your reaction to posts, and they want to know your email password, and censor your political speech, blacklisting people on ideological grounds for their own end, and selling off your personal information to advertisers. Your phone and your TV want to listen to you and send ads to you based on keywords that they hear. The presence of an opportunity is enough to ensure its implementation.
The infamous MK Ultra experiments involved the forced feeding of LSD to unwitting participants in social experiments, and hundreds of these types of experiments are still being conducted today, as made clear by the ‘freedom of information act’, one such project is called ‘little workers’ The presence of opportunity is enough to eat away rights and human dignity, as vultures descend upon the consumer, stripping him of his guaranteed freedoms.
As my basket of contradictions come full circle, there are benefits to systems like China's social credit program. The Army forces you to have good credit in order to obtain a security clearance, and if people understood the broader impacts of good credit on the legitimacy of lenders and their own future financial prospects, we would have a more sound financial system. In our huge urbanized societies, we don’t have a close knit arrangement of people in our community that hold us to accountability when dealing with each other. Being aware of the consequences of our actions is going to have a beneficial effect, and while a social credit score opens the doors to vast repercussions for having thoughts and ideas contrary to your countries party line, it may in some form be beneficial to the civil landscape in encouraging people to act with integrity and decency, without being able to hide beyond the veil of anonymity. The presence of the loopholes that allows for the spying on people's personal conduct online and utilization of their microphones and camera is always enough to premempt their use in illegal scandals which are widely known and in use by ‘more affluent classes’, relegating the victim to the status of more of a zoo animal than a person with protectable freedoms, including the right to privacy.
The financial crisis of 2008 illustrated the immoral conduct of our financial system, and was a just punishment for the greed and corruption rampant in the financial industry, which was an indicator of a more broad sense of entitlement and corrupt instinct that pulses like a vein through our society. You don’t need massive government oversight to know that you can’t lend a consumer $150k for a home when they have no income, no job, and no assets, but the simple presence of the opportunity to bundle these toxic assets into complex derivatives and “send it , bro” was enough to entice hundreds of billions in fraud. The simple presence of an opportunity for fraud should not preclude it’s massive utilization on an economy wide scale.
The presence of my unlocked bicycle was always enough to entice it’s theft, the presence of my tax return in my mailbox was enough to motivate it’s theft. Shame and guilt do not seem to be enough to save us from hurting each other for the purpose of our own gains. Facebook wants to look through your camera to see your facial expression to gauge your reaction to posts, and they want to know your email password, and censor your political speech, blacklisting people on ideological grounds for their own end, and selling off your personal information to advertisers. Your phone and your TV want to listen to you and send ads to you based on keywords that they hear. The presence of an opportunity is enough to ensure its implementation.
The infamous MK Ultra experiments involved the forced feeding of LSD to unwitting participants in social experiments, and hundreds of these types of experiments are still being conducted today, as made clear by the ‘freedom of information act’, one such project is called ‘little workers’ The presence of opportunity is enough to eat away rights and human dignity, as vultures descend upon the consumer, stripping him of his guaranteed freedoms.
As my basket of contradictions come full circle, there are benefits to systems like China's social credit program. The Army forces you to have good credit in order to obtain a security clearance, and if people understood the broader impacts of good credit on the legitimacy of lenders and their own future financial prospects, we would have a more sound financial system. In our huge urbanized societies, we don’t have a close knit arrangement of people in our community that hold us to accountability when dealing with each other. Being aware of the consequences of our actions is going to have a beneficial effect, and while a social credit score opens the doors to vast repercussions for having thoughts and ideas contrary to your countries party line, it may in some form be beneficial to the civil landscape in encouraging people to act with integrity and decency, without being able to hide beyond the veil of anonymity. The presence of the loopholes that allows for the spying on people's personal conduct online and utilization of their microphones and camera is always enough to premempt their use in illegal scandals which are widely known and in use by ‘more affluent classes’, relegating the victim to the status of more of a zoo animal than a person with protectable freedoms, including the right to privacy.
Music selection.
I want to say that the U.S. theoretically wants to “play fair” with governments- if we lowered minimum wage to 5 dollars a day and let in 100% of the immigrants, we could build an industrial base rivaling China, and keep in mind a giant percent of their GDP (around 40%) as of 2010 at least was from international investment. China has an advantage in that it coerces the people without giving them any leverage- in Vietnam the U.S. military wanted to fight to the finish but the people would not stand for it. Also the government spends a huge portion of the entire GDP in it’s paternalistic venue, and has a dizzying portfolio of government owned enterprises, in the US the government relies strictly on personal consumption, income and corporate taxes, as well as borrowing, this has the effect of strengthening China’s government position in that it can allow lower rates for corporations and provide a more robust funding structure for itself- so their entry into the world bank and the IMF in April 1980 was subject to the most stringent guidelines of any country.
The U.S. dollar is an international exchange currency, and has convertibility as a floating currency, meaning it can be bought and sold internationally as part of an agreed upon system which allows the alleviations of imbalances, and the fluctuations of confidence levels in our monetary system. China has a currency that devalues itself, which acts like creating far larger sums of dollar bills, confusing exchange rates, since it is not convertable, giving the “renmibi” (yuan) an overseas presence shrouded in mystery, and hence people do end up in many cases getting goods far cheaper than seems even possible. This is an uneducated analyses of this phenomenon, but if you look at the total currency of the U.S. plus China, you have x+y, x+y is like it’s own currency, it pays and receives in goods back and forth from China. x=x, and y=y, so we are told. But we don’t really know what is going on so what if we have China=x+(?) and the U.S.=y. Say you have 4 marbles and I have four marbles and we are trading, and you add a marble and keep trading, your currency is not floating, so the marble does not dilute the value of your currency immediately, for a moment it looks like you have way more bargaining power. x+1>y.
The book takes a lot of time on introspection, looking at the feelings that people feel in these different countries, “modernity” is a major element of the book. There is a charming characterisation of japan, that describes their rigourous rules based culture which always living in the future, constantly driving and innovating, the picture of a futuristic society. He describes this in great detail which is why i captured the pages for you to check out.
The U.S. dollar is an international exchange currency, and has convertibility as a floating currency, meaning it can be bought and sold internationally as part of an agreed upon system which allows the alleviations of imbalances, and the fluctuations of confidence levels in our monetary system. China has a currency that devalues itself, which acts like creating far larger sums of dollar bills, confusing exchange rates, since it is not convertable, giving the “renmibi” (yuan) an overseas presence shrouded in mystery, and hence people do end up in many cases getting goods far cheaper than seems even possible. This is an uneducated analyses of this phenomenon, but if you look at the total currency of the U.S. plus China, you have x+y, x+y is like it’s own currency, it pays and receives in goods back and forth from China. x=x, and y=y, so we are told. But we don’t really know what is going on so what if we have China=x+(?) and the U.S.=y. Say you have 4 marbles and I have four marbles and we are trading, and you add a marble and keep trading, your currency is not floating, so the marble does not dilute the value of your currency immediately, for a moment it looks like you have way more bargaining power. x+1>y.
The book takes a lot of time on introspection, looking at the feelings that people feel in these different countries, “modernity” is a major element of the book. There is a charming characterisation of japan, that describes their rigourous rules based culture which always living in the future, constantly driving and innovating, the picture of a futuristic society. He describes this in great detail which is why i captured the pages for you to check out.
The author seems to be in love with China's paternalistic government, mentioning this concept among many other things, many, many times, which leads me to assume he doesn’t remember what he already said. As I just looked up he joined the communist party of Britain at 18, many wayward communists and socialists are fighting for an egalitarian society which I do support, but in their naive and sensitive commitment sometimes they become ‘flippers’ not realizing that the international rivals sometimes use ideology to mask a more visceral and realistic death threat that lurks behind the corner in the form of territorial warfare and power politics.
The military and socialism
Being in the Army, ironically the blunt force used against communism, I am subject to strict government control to the point they can enter your living space, force you to exercise, and I live off government assistance. I recognize some of the great contributions this leads to in the young (or old in my case) enlistee, making him/her subject to scrutinization medically, physically, mentally and financially, and you can’t just call in sick, you definitely have to be at formation before you even go to sick call. The system also helps instill a ‘paternalist’ respect for authority- you can't just quit, you have to face the consequences for a disorderly outburst or a disrespect of your superiors. They even know when you get a speeding ticket... It really is a socialist system with all the benefits that come along with it- free healthcare, education, paid holidays, and plenty of subjection to the ‘social scene’.
I remember reading about soviet era Russia, where everybody had a job guaranteed, and there would be gardeners sitting around toting the party line and sleeping on the job, without a rational competition structure or supply and demand relegating the relevance of their jobs and therefore they were ‘floating’ in space, inefficiently wasting resources. With the belated industrialisation of Ukraine prompting an urbanization that drew from the farming peasantry, the crash of 1933 caused a widespread famine that killed up to 4 million Ukrainians in an event known as Holodomor, meaning “to kill by starvation”. The soviet government carted off the farm surpluses, and printed posters condemning the rampant cannibalism and hoarding by the peasantry. Some of this money no doubt went to feed the Russian gardener, but he was part of a much larger problem with the unrealistic system of economy that caused a major glut.
I have toyed with the idea of competing military units, say instead of one motor pool with mechanics servicing a battalion, you have two smaller companies, in smaller or segmented motor pools, and you have a bonus or time allowance structure that rewards the soldiers and leadership of the company that gets the most work done.
I worked at plastics and printing factories, call centers, roofing companies, restaurants, and hotels, and the labor was cutthroat, and fast paced, everything was centered around the consumer and the business’s life depended on it. Sometimes relying on a guaranteed income without strict accountability creates a glut that deceives taxpayers, creates bad habits, lacks accountability, and can create the conditions for systemic corruption which can be seen in the lowest levels by turning the other cheek to a culture of lackadaisical job performance.
IN CONCLUSION
I have quite a bit more on the docket but I will abstain in favor of getting my bi weekly presentation wrapped up. My talk will be about all the rest, I hope you will partake in it’s watching, following me on instagram, and checking back frequently for the ‘great overhaul’ which is due at least in the next couple of weeks.
The military and socialism
Being in the Army, ironically the blunt force used against communism, I am subject to strict government control to the point they can enter your living space, force you to exercise, and I live off government assistance. I recognize some of the great contributions this leads to in the young (or old in my case) enlistee, making him/her subject to scrutinization medically, physically, mentally and financially, and you can’t just call in sick, you definitely have to be at formation before you even go to sick call. The system also helps instill a ‘paternalist’ respect for authority- you can't just quit, you have to face the consequences for a disorderly outburst or a disrespect of your superiors. They even know when you get a speeding ticket... It really is a socialist system with all the benefits that come along with it- free healthcare, education, paid holidays, and plenty of subjection to the ‘social scene’.
I remember reading about soviet era Russia, where everybody had a job guaranteed, and there would be gardeners sitting around toting the party line and sleeping on the job, without a rational competition structure or supply and demand relegating the relevance of their jobs and therefore they were ‘floating’ in space, inefficiently wasting resources. With the belated industrialisation of Ukraine prompting an urbanization that drew from the farming peasantry, the crash of 1933 caused a widespread famine that killed up to 4 million Ukrainians in an event known as Holodomor, meaning “to kill by starvation”. The soviet government carted off the farm surpluses, and printed posters condemning the rampant cannibalism and hoarding by the peasantry. Some of this money no doubt went to feed the Russian gardener, but he was part of a much larger problem with the unrealistic system of economy that caused a major glut.
I have toyed with the idea of competing military units, say instead of one motor pool with mechanics servicing a battalion, you have two smaller companies, in smaller or segmented motor pools, and you have a bonus or time allowance structure that rewards the soldiers and leadership of the company that gets the most work done.
I worked at plastics and printing factories, call centers, roofing companies, restaurants, and hotels, and the labor was cutthroat, and fast paced, everything was centered around the consumer and the business’s life depended on it. Sometimes relying on a guaranteed income without strict accountability creates a glut that deceives taxpayers, creates bad habits, lacks accountability, and can create the conditions for systemic corruption which can be seen in the lowest levels by turning the other cheek to a culture of lackadaisical job performance.
IN CONCLUSION
I have quite a bit more on the docket but I will abstain in favor of getting my bi weekly presentation wrapped up. My talk will be about all the rest, I hope you will partake in it’s watching, following me on instagram, and checking back frequently for the ‘great overhaul’ which is due at least in the next couple of weeks.